Compare and contrast 2 treatments of crime. (TEP’s and AMP’s Token economy program and anger management program. Essay

minimal thrift programmes are a form of conduct modification based on the principles of operant conditioning. They are utilise in prisons to go on the reduction of anti-social behavior and criminal behavior they involve awarding points to offenders if a desire demeanor is performed. The minimals may hence be exchanged for various rewards. The aim is for the desire behaviour to be repeated. As a discussion it involves setting go forth a ply of desirable behaviours and reinforcing the offender whenever the behaviour is displayed.This behaviour would focus upon non-aggressive, these behaviours are pass judgment that the behaviour pull up s adjudges become erudite and automatic. Positive reinforces come in the practice of imagesa secondary reinforcing stimulus, which jakes be exchanged for ancient reinforcement. Negative reinforcement comes with the threat of removal of tokens and pris adeptrs change their behaviour to avoid this consequence. A token miserline ss system uses operant conditioning to bit by bit changing behaviour through primary and secondary renforcements. Anger divvy upment is some early(a) treatment aimed to prevent law-breaking. It is used in prisons, and participants may participate voluntarily or as part of their sentence.This is used localise triggers which may cause there belligerence. By preventing aggression, the likelihood of crimes being connected is reduced. The treatment unremarkably takes place in sort settings and occurs ab extinct twice a week. A trained person runs the group. They are usually asked what factors make them feel angry and then trigger aggression. Once this trigger has been identified, strategies shadower be taught which to condole and reduce the crossness they experiences.An enkindle oversight programme will be based around 3 key stages cognitive preparation (analysing prehistoric aggression and disc all overing patterns, and the offender also looks at the consequences of agg ression), skills acquisition (where they are taught techniques that help them to manage their response to triggers in a much productive way.) and application practice (the offender to test their skills in a range of situations).Token economy becomes because the behaviour of the offender is being constantly monitored and record in order to award the tokens, and then becomes habit. However it is limited to institutions like a prison for this token economy to work because they will not stop such awards in the veridical world only if it is the plan that over receivable to what is presentationn by operant conditioning these desiredbehaviours may/ washbasin become a habit and thence behaviour is repeated. Anger management can also pack a alike problem, it may be easier to find out your offense and adhere the program while in the group but in the real world it may be harder to follow or perform the behaviours that are learnt from the program. sluice though this may happen for kindle management there is still very unassailable, the offenders take part voluntarily. This increases the programmes usefulness, as offenders who take part voluntarily are usually more committed to the programmes success. This is in wrinkle to other treatments, such as token economy, which are often enforced over an entire prison system heart that it may not be prospering in all cases.But not all wrath management is unpaid worker some people rent to take part as part of their sentence. This provides an posterior motive and although the offender may surface to see made progress, this could be simulated and the issue of anger is not in reality being addressed (demand characteristics). This means that anger management like token economy may not be effective for everyone.Another problem you may sire in anger management is by doing the track they may be singled out (especially in prisons) and by singling out prisoners to show they are doing this program may cause pris oners not to take it seriously or may not consider fetching it voluntary, or may take it for other motives e.g. some times taking the course can help your bid to get erlyer or longer parole periods. Token economy on the other elapse dose not single out specific prisoners as all prisoners have to take part in the programme, no single prisoner can have an ulterior motive for participating.However anger management is supported by Ireland (2000). They compared 50 young offenders on an anger management programme with 37 on the wait list for anger management. Before and by and by treatment scores were taken on level of aggression shown (as reported by prison officers and by the prisoners themselves through self-report). 92% of the treatment group showed some escape from in aggression with 48% demonstrate major decreases. 8% showed deterioration.This evidence shows strong support of anger management programmes as a way to control aggression in prison. Hobbs and Holt (1976) measured t he effect of token economy on a standard of young delinquents across 3 institutions(with one other institution being used as a comparisoncontrol group). Tokens were awarded to those in the data-based groups whenever target behaviour was displayed. These were swapped for primary reinforces. at that place was a significant (28%) increase in the target behaviours in the experimental groups compared to the controls. This shows that the token economy was an effective and cost effective (less than $8 per month per boy) way to control the behaviour of criminals whilst in prison. By comparability the results it would seem that anger management may be more effective as a way to treat crime but the numbers of people who participated was uttermost less so Hobbs and Holt may have less success rate due to the larger groups meaning that the result may be more valid due to it being easer to apply to the prison population.