Innovation in strategy

Innovation in schemeThis essay evaluates the usance of basis in dodging, and explores the ways management good deal promote it in organisations. It first looks at the disposition of intent, and examines its importance in current economical and social conditions. It hence(prenominal) sets outline in context, defining it primarily in terms of agonistic reward that is, as a search for capabilities which allow allows an organisation to contact consumers require transgress than its rivals. It then investigates why, exactly, founding is ofttimes seen as a key persona of strategy. It comes up with two key reasons its capacity to hark back a sustainable belligerent service for line of business organisations and its ability to concern organisations in preventing strategic drift. As a result of these benefits, strategies which atomic number 18 centred upon intention tramp add real value to an organisations value proposition, and consequently thunder mug substantial ly improve business performance. The essay then considers to look at the ways that management screwing promote figure in organisations. For this, it turns to the worlds more than or less famous management thinker dig Drucker and the worlds most(prenominal) innovative fellowship apple Inc. for guidance on speculation and practice respectively. Having thus schematic the importance of the role of invention for strategy, and the ways in which management can promote it in organisations, the essay then considers some limitations. In incident, it looks at the possible advantages of strategic drift and also the new(prenominal) aspects of strategy beyond transition which must(prenominal) be considered by an organisation. The essay thus concludes that knowledgeableness is a necessary component of a triple-crown strategy in that it is able to generate a sustainable competitive advantage for a business scarcely that it is not sufficient in and of itself an organisation must consider more than innovation if it is to develop an effective strategy.Innovation is usually defined as the successful commercial exploitation of new- do ideas or simply as the successful implementation of new ideas. This encompasses ideas that are new to the world, new to an sedulousness or merely new to a particular firm (Gabriel, 2008, p. 146). The prominence given to the role of innovation in strategy is to a large extent the result of the prevailing social and economic conditions. In what Peter Drucker the most influential management thinker of the second-half of the twentieth century termed the intimacy economy that has emerged due to the rise of the service industry and decline of manufacturing since the end of the Second World War, business organisations have progressively had to react to change more rapidly if they wish to succeed in the groceryplace (Drucker, 1992, p. 263). Indeed, so all important(predicate) is the successful implementation of new ideas th at Drucker famously reflected that Business has only two basic functions marketing and innovation (Kotler Armstrong, 2008, p. 40). In other words, a business organisation must first seduce a customer, but consequently that business must constantly suit to provide the necessary goods and services to keep them making a increase they must pursue innovation both to survive and to thrive.Having explored the nature of innovation, it is effectual now to define what is meant by strategy, and examine briefly why it matters. The nature of strategy has traditionally been a contentious issue. A helpful outset point for at a lower placestanding the concept is found in Anthony Henrys (2008) Understanding strategical Management, where he provides a synopsis of forty years of heated roll on the issue. He first outlines that, there is agreement that the role of strategy is to achieve competitive advantage for an organisation. He then continues Competitive advantage may social occasionfull y be thought of as that which allows an organisation to spiel consumers needs better than its rivals . . . and its source may derive from a quash of factors including its products or services, its culture, its technological know-how, and its processes (Henry, 2008, p. 4). It is an important issue for a business because a strategy which can enable a sustainable competitive advantage will allow an organisation to generate super-normal returns, and will have a distinct impact on overall organisational performance an effective strategy can add value (Kay, 1995).Herein lies the essence of the role of innovation in strategy it is often a key component of a sustainable competitive advantage. For instance, Grant (2005, p. 513) has observed from empirical evidence ground on such successful companies as 3M, Wal-Mart, and Toyota that, ultimately, the only sustainable competitive advantage is the ability to create new sources of competitive advantage. Firms with a repair trueness to innov ation seem to prosper in the modern knowledge economy. For instance, Apple a connection which this essay examines in more profundity below has become synonymous with strategic innovation. In flocks Americas Most look up to Companies 2008, Apple topped the chart. A senior commentator reflected on this using with the hobby remarkApple not only takes the No. 1 slot on this years list of Americas Most Admired Companies but also tops the global survey and wins the highest marks for innovation too. Thats in all likelihood no coincidence. In an industry that changes every nanosecond, the 32-year-old company has time and over again innovated its way out of the doldrums. Rivals always seem to be playing catch-up. (Fisher, 2008)Moreover, innovation can be key to preventing strategic drift. Strategic drift is the intent for strategies to develop incrementally on the basis of historical and cultural influences but to travel to keep pace with a changing environment (Johnson, Scholes , Whittington, 2008, p. 179). This is what move oned to Sainsburys who were one of the most successful food retailers in the world until the early 1990s, using a tried-and-tested formula of selling high quality food at sightly prices. Its strategy consisted of gradually ext refinement its product lines, enlarging its stores, and expanding its geographical coverage but under no circumstances would it deviate from its traditional ways of doing business (Johnson, Scholes, Whittington, 2008, p. 179). However, during Sainsburys decimal point of strategic drift, its rival Tesco followed a policy of ruthless innovation underdeveloped Club-Card marketing, building a successful on-line retailing capability, and implementing new ideas to radically reduce its distribution costs (IMD, 2008). By having a strategy centred on innovation, therefore, Tesco was able to both establish a competitive advantage and forefend strategic drift. It was, in short, able to develop a strategy which adde d value, and which made the business organisation much more profitable.So where can business organisations look for innovation how can they promote it more effectively? Peter Drucker has suggested that there are seven areas where companies should look for such opportunities. These have been expertly surmised by Hindle (2008, p. 105), as being the unexpected success that is rarely cleft to see how it has occurred any incongruity between what actually happens and what was expected to happen any inadequacy in a business process that is interpreted for granted a change in industry or market structure that takes everyone by surprise demographic changes caused by things like wars, migrations or medical developments (such as the birth-control pill) changes in perception and fashion brought about by changes in the economy and changes in awareness caused by new knowledge. Moreover, although it is often the case that innovation has been used interchangeably with the term creativity (Forrest er 1993, p. 3 cited in Thompson McHugh, 2002, p. 255), Drucker insists that this ought never to limit a business, cl carrying that There are more ideas in any organization, including businesses, than can possibly be put to use (Drucker, 1964, p. 188). Across the literature on innovation, there seems to be a widely distributed agreement with this approach set out above that the opportunities for innovation are multitudinous, and that by paying attending to such factors organisations can develop strategies which can lead to a sustainable competitive advantage and prevent strategic drift.A brief case-study of Apple will help demonstrate how this theory outlined above works in practice, and help us to better understand the ways management can promote innovation in organisations. First, Apple appreciates that innovation is an inexact scientific discipline as the CEO and cofounder of Apple, Steve Jobs, puts it You deliver ask people what they want if its around the next corner quit e you have to simply provide what you think they might want (Morris, 2008). To require them, Apple looks to the areas mentioned by Drucker above to gain insights into such potential needs and wants. Apple employees in particular focus on the inadequacies in every-day engine room processes that are currently taken for granted, and innovate in these areas. New-product development, according to Apple sources, occurs as a result of conversations such as What do we scorn? (Our cellphones.) What do we have the technology to make? (A cellphone with a mack inside.) What would we like to own? (You guessed it, an iPhone) (Morris, 2008).Moreover, at Apple, innovation is centred on producing technology the employees actually want as Jobs says, One of the keys to innovation at Apple is that we build products that really turn us on (Morris, 2008). This results in an organisation thoroughly committed to the successful commercial exploitation of new ideas at a strategic, operational and tactic al level. Indeed Morris (2008), observing the culture of innovation at Apple, has pointed out that You rule find that word on a placard or a piece of propaganda at One Infinite Loop, Apples headquarters . . . there innovation is a way of life. It is this culture that provides the push to overcome design and engine room obstacles, and to bring projects in on time (Morris, 2008). Thus a commitment to a strategy of innovation should foster a culture which reflects this aim of management, as this can lead to the organisation innovating more effectively.Finally, it is important to phone line the impact of a strategy centred on innovation upon the performance of Apple. It has stunned commentators with one perplexed writer asking who knew Apple could build a . . . successful company on the strength of a portable jukebox and a ready reckoner with a single-digit market share? (Elmer-DeWitt, 2008). Indeed, the company has been monetarily hugely successful as a result of the innovation i t has pioneered. In the 5 years ending in March 2008, sales of Apple wares tripled to $24 billion and internet rose to $3.5 billion, from a mere $42 million only five years before. Morris (2008) sums up the position of Apple thusIt set the metallic standard for corporate America with an entirely new business personate creating a brand, morphing it, and reincarnating it to thrive in a disruptive age. . . Apple has present how to create real, breathtaking growth by dreaming up products so new and ingenious that they have upended one industry later another consumer electronics, the record industry, the movie industry, video and music production.Thus innovation can play a key role in an organisations strategy, and it can often be effectively promoted by following the theory of Drucker and the practices of Apple. Nevertheless, it is important to note that there are limitations on the role of innovation in strategy. First, strategic drift may not be such a bad thing after all. This is a view outlined by John Kay (2009) in his article History vindicates the science of muddling through. He contrasts the views of the American political scientist Charles Lindblom (published in 1959) with those of Dr H. Igor Ansoff. Lindblom supported a view of incremental allowance by organisations to changes in their environment Ansoff proposed a design-orientated, purposive approach to strategy. However, Kay then points that in terms of the organisational case-studies used to support each view Saint-Gobain for Lindbolm the US conglomerates TRW and Litton for Ansoff the clear winner emerges as Saint-Gobain, a company which adopted a quasi-strategic drift approach to their strategy, which is still going strong while the other companies have suffered catastrophic failure. Thus, it seems that sometimes simply muddling through can cook an effective strategy perhaps a firm commitment to innovation is not necessary after all.Moreover, innovation is not the sole component of an eff ective strategy, and it never can be. Organisations must consider a contrive of other issues. For instance, business organisations ought to consider issues highlighted by Michael Porters Five Forces model. This shows how the strategic positioning of a company can be established by analyse the power of suppliers, the power of buyers, the threat of substitution, the threat of new entrants, as hale as the degree of competitive rivalry between the industrys firms. An organisation must consider innovation if it is to ensure that it continues to have an effective strategy in the medium to long term, but it must also pay attention to these other aspects of strategy innovation is necessary, but it is not sufficient.Thus innovation is a necessary component of a successful strategy in that it is able to generate a sustainable competitive advantage for a business. However, it is not sufficient an organisation must consider other issues as well as innovation if it is to develop an effecti ve strategy. Nevertheless, by following the theory of Drucker and learning from the practices of Apple, management can promote innovation in organisations. And if this is done effectively, innovation can play a key role in what every business organisation seeks a competitive strategy which adds real value.ReferencesDrucker, P. (1964). Managing for results economic tasks and risk-taking decisions. California Harper Row.Drucker, P. (1992). The age of discontinuity guidelines to our changing society. second ed. New Jersey Transaction Publishers.Elmer-DeWitt, P. (2008, March 3). Americas Most Admired Companies 2008. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from contingency Web site http//money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0802/gallery.mostadmired_top20.fortune/index.htmlFisher, A. (2008, March 3 ). Innovation Rules. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from Fortune Web site http//money.cnn.com/2008/02/29/news/companies/fisher_amac.fortune/index.htm 2008Gabriel, Y. (2008). Organizing Words A tiny Thesa urus for Social and Organization Studies. Oxford Oxford University Press.Grant, R. M. (2005). Contemporary strategy analysis. 5th ed. capital of the United Kingdom Wiley-Blackwell.Henry, A. (2008). Understanding Strategic Management. Oxford Oxford University Press.Hindle, T. (2008). Guide to Management Ideas and Gurus. London Profile Books.IMD. (2008). Tesco safekeeping the Hard Discounters at Bay? Switzerland IMD International.Johnson, G., Scholes, K., Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy text cases. eighth ed. Harlow Pearson development.Kay, J. (1995). Foundations of corporate success how business strategies add value. Oxford Oxford University Press.Kay, J. (2009, March 15). History vindicates the science of muddling through. Retrieved December 13, 2009, from John Kay Web sit http//www.johnkay.com/in_action/604Kotler, P., Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of Marketing. 13th ed. London Pearson Education Ltd.Morris, B. (2008, March 17). What makes Apple Golden? Re trieved October 27, 2009, from Fortune Web site http//money.cnn.com/2008/02/29/news/companies/amac_apple.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008030309Thompson, P., McHugh, D. (2002). Work Organisations. 3rd ed. London Palgrave.