Family Therapy Model Essay

Family therapy models of psych otherapy can be divided into three categorisationsa diachronic, historical, and existential (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). The ahistorical classification includes structural family therapy, strategic family therapy, behavioral family therapy, psychoeducational family therapy, and colloquy models (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). The historical classification includes object relations possibleness and Bowen systems theory (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).The experiential classification contains only one modelthe experiential family therapy model (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). While the historical models focus on changing the familys patterns of interaction as a means of removing the presenting problems, the historical models are rooted in psychoanalysis, with a long-life therapy intervention in which the therapist is less involved than in the other classifications (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).Experiential models, on the other hand, are to a greater extent concerned with the endurings growth, a process of both experiencing and monitoring internal problems, and the affected roles self-identity development within the family context (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).The history of the models and the therapists role in from each one differs, so given the size limitations of this paper, a separate history on each is not feasible. Each theory has its own major contributors. Among the ahistorical models, structural family theory, for example, was influenced by Gregory Bateson, who foc utilize on verbal and nonverbal discourse the Palo Alto Team, which developed the concept of family homeostasis and Salvador Minuchin, who apothegm families as functioning to socialize children and facilitate the mutual support of married couples, suffering problems when boundaries were either too porous or too morose (Werner-Wilson, n.d., pp. 2-4).Of the historical models, object relations theory was influenced by Melanie Klein and later by Otto Ker nberg, who focused on drives and the consolidation of Freudian and non-Freudian objectrelations theory, on an individual basis (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3 Tribich, 1981, p. 27). In the experiential model, Whitaker redefined symptoms as attempts at growth and used modeling to offer fantasy alternatives to actual stressors (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 12). Three of the five trace concepts of family therapy models are embodied in Schutzs Fundamental Interpersonal kin Orientation, or FIRO modelinclusion, control, and affection (Hafner & Ross, 1989, p. 974).Parr (2000, p. 256) refers to the affection concept as association when she states, The family FIRO model hypothesizes a paradigmatic view of the familys relationship transcription around the three interrelated core needs of inclusion, control, and intimacy. Inclusion involves a feeling of belonging within the family context, and it requires a sense of connectedness, a divided up belief system, and an organized structure that th e family incorporates to handle issues of roles and boundaries (Parr, 2000, p. 255).The concept of control involves the mode the family interacts in terms of power and influence, as when these are used to unfreeze conflict in the areas of discipline, role negotiations, and problem solving (Parr, 2000, p. 256). The affection or intimacy concept demonstrates the family members needs for interactions that allow them to be open with each other about their feelings and areas of vulnerability (Parr, 2000, p. 256). Another key concept is communication theory.There are varied types of communication theory, but the one that is close to appropriate to family therapy is family communication patterns theory, which serves as a model of family communication establish on relational connections among communication behaviors (Fitzpatrick, 2004, p. 175). Finally, the concept of interlockings is an integral part of the family therapy approach. Networks entrust support during family therapy when t he family itself is under stress.As Goldenberg and Goldenberg (p. 12) point out, The support of a network of friends, extended family, clergy, neighbors, employers, and fellow employees and the availability of residential area resources often contribute to family recovery, and correct chaotic, disorganized, abusive, and multi-problem families have resources. An evaluation of family therapy from the Christian perspective reveals that it is compatible with Christian principles.Because it is a mode of therapy predicated mainly on understanding the dynamics of family life and serving family members to change their dysfunctional behavior, in that respect is little in family therapy thatruns at cross-purposes with Christian thinking. Inclusion, control, and affection are all Christian concepts as well. Everyone is included in the group of those eligible to be Christians, and one only needs to favor to belong. Control of ones actions is integral to the Christian perspective, with mani festations of a wish of control being regarded as problems.Affection is a hallmark of Christianity, and the Nazarene displayed genuine affection to people, urging his disciples to do the same. Communication theory is more than relevant to Christianity, as evidenced by the vast amount of communication that takes place in the Bible and the many interactions that are recorded there to help believers understand both desirable and undesirable forms of communication. Moreover, Christianity is a community-oriented organized religion in many ways, urging believers to help those in need and to complete others, so its precepts fit neatly into the concept of the support network, as well. rescuer traveled about the countryside, as did His disciples, taking help to people in various towns along the way, and there is a palpable sense of community in the Christian way of life, which considers other peoples feelings, welfare, and interests as well as ones own. Finally, there is in Christianity a strong family model, as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are essentially a divine family unit, and thus family therapy models are intrinsically structured to relate to the Christian model.ReferencesFitzpatrick, M.A. (2004). Family Communication Patterns supposition Observations on its Development and Application. The Journal of Family Communication, 4(3/4), 167-179. EBSCO Host. Goldenberg, H., Goldenberg, I. (2007).Family Therapy An Overview. Florence, KY Brooks Cole. Griffin, W.A., Greene, S.M. (1998). Models of Family Therapy The meaty Guide. New York Routledge. Hafner, R.J., Ross, M.W. (1989).The FIRO Model of Family Therapy Implications of Factor Analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(6), 974-979. Klein, M., Tribich, D. (1981). Kernbergs Object-Relations Theory A Critical Evaluation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 62, 27-43. Retrieved on March 25, 2010 from http//www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=IJP.062.0027A Werner-Wilson, R.J. (n.d.). Family Therapy Theory. Retrieved on March 25, 2010 fromhttp//www.public.iastate.edu/hd_fs.511/lecture/Sourcebook20.ppt